|Ahead of print
Sikiru Adekola Adebayo1, Ijeoma Nkemdilim Chibuzo2, Augustine Oghenewyin Takure3, Gabriel Olabiyi Ogun4, Michael Chigoziem Nweke5, Olayiwola Babatunde Shittu3, E Oluwabunmi Olapade-Olaopa3
1 Department of Surgery, University of Ibadan; Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
2 Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
3 Department of Surgery, University of Ibadan; Department of Surgery, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
4 Department of College of Medicine, University of Ibadan; Department of Pathology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
5 Department of Pathology, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria
Click here for correspondence address and email
Scrotal leiomyomata are rare benign tumours of the dartos muscle or subcutaneous tissues of the scrotum. We present a case of a 33-year-old male with a left hemiscrotal mass which was initially thought to be a sebaceous cyst, and later, a paratesticular tumour. Histology of the excised mass revealed a scrotal leiomyoma, an uncommon lesion.
Keywords: Dartos, leiomyoma, scrotum
| Introduction|| |
Scrotal leiomyomata (SL) are rare, benign, and usually solitary, sessile or pedunculated soft tissue tumours involving the dartos muscle or subcutaneous tissues of the scrotum.,, Soft tissue tumours may be superficial or deep. The superficial tumours originate from three sites, namely the erector pili, blood vessels and external genitalia. Genital tumours, which essentially involve the vulva, nipple and scrotum, account for less than 5% of soft tissue tumours.
Ninety-four cases of scrotal leiomyoma were found in a multinational literature review [Table 1]. The rarity of the lesion is further displayed by the report of Siegal and Gaffey who found 11 scrotal leiomyomata amongst 11,000 benign and malignant scrotal neoplasms – 0.01%; Fisher and Helwig found 4 SL amid 54 soft tissue tumours; Yokoyama et al found 4 SL among 19,000 benign soft tissue tumours; and Newman and Fletcher found 4 cases of SL when 32 genital tumours in patients of both genders were reviewed. It occurs more commonly in Caucasians. Few reports of SL in people of African descent were found in the literature reviewed.,,, Scrotal leiomyomata may mimic testicular or paratesticular tumours and are sometimes treated as such prior to histologic diagnosis.,,
|Table 1: Compilation of 94 cases of scrotal leiomyomata from various nations|
Click here to view
| Case Report|| |
A 33-year-old Yoruba native of Southwestern Nigeria presented with 1-year history of a painless left hemiscrotal swelling that progressively increased in size. There was no pruritus or skin ulceration. He had no cough, fever, drenching night sweats or weight loss. There were no swellings elsewhere. Examination revealed a young male who had a hypopigmented, firm, irregular, non-tender 6 cm × 5 cm mass which was tethered to the skin of the left hemiscrotum. The left testis and cord structures, were palpable, separate from the mass and felt normal. There were distended superficial veins overlying the mass. The inguinal lymph nodes were not significantly enlarged. The right hemiscrotum, testis and cord structures were normal. A diagnosis of a sebaceous cyst of the scrotal skin was made.
A scrotal ultrasound scan showed a 54 mm × 40 mm mass of mixed echotexture arising from the scrotal skin and dartos tunica. Both testes were separate from the mass and of normal volume. Β-human chorionic gonadotrophin was 0.4 iu/l (normal values are <2.6 iu/l) whilst α-fetoprotein (AFP) was elevated at 10.3 ng/ml (normal values are <7.0 ng/ml). Due to the elevated AFP levels and a consequent suspicion of a paratesticular malignancy, he had an abdominopelvic ultrasound scan which showed a normal, smooth liver with a span of 13.6 cm and normal parenchymal echoes. No deposits were seen within it nor was there ductal dilatation. No para-aortic lymph nodes were seen.
He defaulted from care and represented with gross increase in the size of the mass, which now spanned almost the entire left hemiscrotum [Figure 1]. There was neither ulceration nor palpable inguinal lymphadenopathy still.
|Figure 1: Photograph of the scrotal mass at initial presentation (original)|
Click here to view
A wide excision of the mass was done using local anaesthesia. An elliptical left hemiscrotal incision extending from the root of the penis to the fundus of the hemiscrotum was made. This spanned about 12 cm and encompassed the mass with a 2 cm normal skin margin [Figure 2]. The left testis and cord structures were separate from the scrotal mass. The mass was irregular, multinodular, arose from the scrotal wall, weighed 300 g and measured 11 cm × 8 cm × 8 cm. He was discharged home the same day on oral antibiotics and analgesics. His post-operative recovery was uneventful.
The cut section of the excised mass had a whorled appearance. Photomicrographs [Figure 3]a and [Figure 3]b show sections of the scrotal mass biopsy with a benign mesenchymal neoplasm composed of proliferating smooth muscle cells disposed in long interlacing fascicles with interspersed areas of hyalinised stroma (at low magnification × 40). The component cells are of smooth muscle derivation and are characteristically spindle-shaped having fusiform ends and containing hyperchromatic cigar-shaped nuclei. These cells are benign, appearing with bland cytology. Occasionally, pleomorphic cells may be seen. This is still in keeping with a diagnosis of a scrotal leiomyoma. There were no areas of necrosis or atypical mitosis. The mitotic count was ≤1 mitosis/10 high-power fields. There were no tumour cells in the margin of the resected mass. Immunohistochemical staining showed a positive cytoplasmic expression of vimentin and desmin intermediate filaments [Figure 3]c and [Figure 3]d. Immunohistochemical stains carried out for cytokeratin expression (AE1/AE3), S100 and mitotic activity (Ki-67) were negative [Figure 3]e and [Figure 3]f. The final histological diagnosis was a leiomyoma of the scrotum.
|Figure 3: (a) Whorling fascicles of smooth muscle (H and E-stained × 40)-original. (b) Cigar-shaped bland nuclei with eosinophilic cytoplasm (H and E-stained × 100)-original. (c) Positive vimentin expression (vimentin immunohistochemical staining × 100)-original. (d) Positive desmin expression (desmin immunohistochemical staining × 100)-original. (e) Negative S100 expression by tumour (S100 immunohistochemical staining × 400)-original. (f) Negative S100 expression by tumour (S100 immunohistochemical staining × 400)-original|
Click here to view
One year afterwards, there was neither local recurrence nor enlarged inguinal lymph node. Both testes were intrascrotal and of normal volume [Figure 4]. A repeat AFP showed persistence of the elevation. The liver function tests, however, were normal. He was to be monitored with serial hepatic ultrasound scans.
| Discussion|| |
A scrotal leiomyoma is a slow-growing tumour of the dartos muscle of the scrotum usually located within the corium, but which could extend across it. It typically occurs in Caucasians from the fourth to the ninth decades of life, with a peak in the fourth decade.,, The largest reported diameter was 14cm, with most being between 0.6 and 6 cm.[2–4,13] The largest reported weight was 8 kg. They may appear as solid hypoechoic masses on ultrasound scan. The cut sections of the lesion characteristically show a whorled appearance grossly and whorling fascicles of the tumour cells on histology.
Scrotal leiomyomata are classified into two groups, namely, typical and atypical leiomyomata. This is based on histological features namely: (i) size ≥ 5 cm in widest dimensions; (ii) presence of infiltrating margins; (iii) ≥ 5 mitotic figures per 10 high-power fields; and (iv) moderate cytological atypia. Those with one of the features are termed typical scrotal leiomyomata while possession of two features confers upon the lesion an atypical status.,, The atypical type of scrotal leiomyoma is even rarer. Possession of three or more features suggests a leiomyosarcoma. Based on these criteria, our index case was a typical SL.
Alpha fetoprotein (AFP) was elevated in this patient even after excision of the tumour. Typically, AFP serves as a tumour marker for malignant tumours like hepatoblastoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, non-seminomatous germ cell tumours (embryonal carcinoma, endodermal sinus tumours, yolk sac tumours) in men. Rarely, it may be elevated in gastric, pancreatic, biliary, breast and lung malignancies. Other situations in which AFP may be elevated in men hepatitis or cirrhosis. Normal values are less than 5.4 ng/ml and are usually less than 10ng/ml., The reference value at our centre is < 7.0 ng/ml. Despite close follow-up, no identifiable cause of elevated AFP was found in our patient. Hereditary persistence of AFP (HPAFP) is an autosomal dominant familial disorder, with a mutation on the 5' nucleotide of the gene coding for hepatic nuclear factor 1, resulting in increased AFP gene transcription and consequently, elevated AFP levels. Only 19 such families have been described.  None of his family members turned up to have their AFP levels determined to exclude HPAFP.
The predominant treatment offered for SL is surgical excision. Only one report of a recurrent lesion was found, with a subsequent histological diagnosis of a leiomyosarcoma and use of radium as an adjuvant.
| Conclusion|| |
Scrotal leiomyoma, a benign tumour of the dartos muscle of the scrotum, can mimic a sebaceous cyst or paratesticular tumour.
Declaration of patient consent
The authors certify that they have obtained all appropriate patient consent forms. In the form, the patient has given his consent for his images and other clinical information to be reported in the journal. The patient understands that name and initials will not be published and due efforts will be made to conceal identity, but anonymity cannot be guaranteed.
Financial support and sponsorship
Conflicts of interest
There are no conflicts of interest.
| References|| |
Fisher WC, Helwig EB. Leiomyomas of the Skin. Arch Dermatol 1963;88:510-20.
Das AK, Bolick D, Little NA, Walther PJ. Pedunculated scrotal mass: Leiomyoma of scrotum. Urology 1992;39:376-9.
Rana S, Sharma P, Singh P, Satarkar RN. Leiomyoma of scrotum: A rare case report. Iran J Pathol 2015;10:243-7.
Newman P, Fletcher C. Smooth muscle tumours of the external genitalia: clinicopathological analysis of a series. Histopathology 1991;18:523-9.
Siegal GP, Gaffey TA. Solitary Leiomyomas arising from the tunica dartos scroti. J Urol 1976;116:69-71.
Yokoyama R, Hashimoto H, Daimaeu Y, Enjoji M. Superficial Leiomyomas. Pathol Int 1987;37:1415-22.
Gowda KK, Rao RN. Intra-Scrotal Extra-Testicular Leiomyoma, a common mesenchymal tumor at a rare site: Emphasizing the Need for Awareness of Its Occurrence. Open J Pathol. 2015;5:8-11.
Hind B, Badredine H. Pedunculate leiomyoma of the scrotum. Pan Afr Med J 2015;20: 447. doi:10.11604/pamj.2015.20.447.6817.
Ozkan L, Ozkurkcugil C, Gok ND, Ozkan TA, Yildiz K. Angioleiomyoma of the scrotal wall. J Chinese Med Assoc. 2011;74:275-6.
Kim NR, Sung CO, Han J. Bizarre Leiomyoma of the scrotum. J Korean Med Sci. 2003;18:452.
Minami M, Inoue W, Uchida M. Leiomyoma of the scrotum: a case report. Hinyokika Kiyo 1999;45:207-9.
Mak CW, Tzeng WS. Sonography of the scrotum. In: Thoirs K, editor. Sonography. Croatia: Intechopen 2012. p. 1-28.
Sarma D, Santos E, Hagen C, Repertinger S. Scrotal leiomyoma. Internet J Dermatology 2008;7:1-3.
Winkel A, Schmitz K, Kusche D. Monstrous scrotal leiomyoma: case report and literature survey. Aktuelle Urol 2014;45:293-5.
Amiri FS. Serum tumor markers in chronic kidney disease: as clinical tool in diagnosis, treatment and prognosis of cancers. Ren Fail 2016;38:530-44.
Marella S. Prognostic and predictive markers in early detection of different types of cancers for selected organ sites. IOSR J Pharm Biol Sci 2013;8:25-42.
Houwert AC, Giltay JC, Lentjes EGWM, Lock MTWT. Hereditary persistence of alpha-fetoprotein (HPAFP): Review of the literature. Neth J Med 2010;68:354-8.
Stout AP. Solitary cutaneous and subcutaneous leiomyoma. Am J Cancer 1937;29:435-69.
Herbut PA. Urological Pathology. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1952.
Benson C, Webster J, McDonald J. Leiomyoma of tunica dartos scroti; a case report. J Mich State Med Soc 1961;60:1553-4.
Grace D. Leiomyoma of the Scrotum: A case report and review of the literature. J Urol 1964;91:396-9.
Matsubara J, Miura K, Morita K. Leiomyoma of the scrotum: suggestive of malignancy. Gan No Rinsho 1971;17:151-4.
Iloreta AT, Bekirov H, Newman HR. Leiomyoma of scrotum. Urology. 1977;10:48-9.
Marrese M, Ribiero C, Nudei J. Leiomyoma of the scrotum. Rev Paul Med. 1979;94:38-9.
Tomera KM, Gaffey TA, Goldstein IS, Zincke H. Leiomyoma of scrotum. Urology 1981;18:388-9.
Livne PM, Nobel M, Savir A, Avidor I, Servadio C. Leiomyoma of the Scrotum. Arch Dermatol 1983;119:358-9.
Giyanani V, Hennigan D, Fowler M, Sanders T. Sonographic findings in leiomyoma of postorchiectomy scrotum. Urology 1985;25:204-6.
Nishiyama N, Hibi H, Yanaoka M, Naide Y. A case of bizarre leiomyoma of the scrotum. Hinyokika Kiyo 1987;33:961-3.
Palacios J, Fiter L, Regadera J, Nistal M, Martínez-Piñeiro J. Leiomyoma of the scrotum: presentation of 2 cases. Arch Esp Urol 1987;40:45-7.
Wolf DI. Solitary Nodule of the Scrotum. Arch Dermatol 1989;125:421-2.
Habuchi T, Okagaki T, Miyakawa M. Leiomyoma of the scrotum: A case report and sonographic findings. Hinyokika Kiyo 1990;36:959-62.
Haouet S, Kassar L, Kchir N, Boubaker S, Kacem M, Zitouna M. Scrotal leiomyoma. Presse Med 1990;19:1464.
Chang SG, Lee SC, Park YK, Chai SE. Pedunculated leiomyoma of scrotum. J Korean Med Sci 1991;6:284-6.
Sánchez BC, Navarro MN, Vázquez NS. Scrotal leiomyosarcoma: Report of a case. Actas Urol Esp 1991;15:463-4.
Naka Y, Okada H, Kawamura H, Komatz Y, Sakaida N, Tsubura A. Intrascrotal leiomyoma: report of a case. Hinyokika Kiyo 1991;37:553-5.
De Rosa G, Boscaino A, Giordano G, Donofrio V, Staibano S, Maio C, et al
. Symplastic leiomyoma of the scrotum. A case report. Pathologica 1996;88:55-7.
Ohtake N, Maeda S, Kanzaki T, Shimoinaba K. Leiomyoma of the Scrotum. Dermatology. 1997;194:299-301.
Rodríguez-Parets JO, Silva Abuín J, Abad Hernández M, Tinajas Saldaña A, Martín Rodríguez A, García Macías C, et al
. Atypical scrotal leiomyoma. A case report. Actas Urol Esp 1998;22:613-5.
Slone S, O'Connor D. Scrotal leiomyomas with bizarre nuclei: A report of three cases. Mod Pathol 1998;11:282-7.
Walser AC, Klotz T, Schoenenberger AJ. Ulcerated scrotal leiomyoma. Urologe 1999;38:370-1.
Sánchez MJ, Gómez CS, Fernández-Flores A, Parra ML, López PJ, García AJ. Scrotal leiomyoma. Actas Urol Esp 2001;25:233-6.
Herbert M, Segal M, Hermann G, Sandbank J. Pleomorphic leimyoma of the scrotum: Immunohistochemical stains. Isr Med Assoc J. 2001;3:543-4.
Braun-Falco M, Eberlein-König B, Ring J, Hein R. Scrotal leiomyoma. Hautarzt 2002;53:258-60.
Ameur A, Touiti D, Jira H, el Alami M, Ouahbi Y, Abbar M. Multiple leiomyoma of the scrotum. A case report. Ann Urol 2002;36:154-6.
Hermosa del RGM, Zabaleta BA, Valero ML, Pérez RG, Güemes MG, Arechavala RS. Leiomioma escrotal pediculado. Actas Dermosifiliogr 2002;93:522-3.
Aristu JJ, Paul PM, Cárdenas de PA, Calv JJ, Uruñuela LF, Gómez SC, et al
. Scrotal leiomyoma: report of a case. Actas Urol Esp 2003;27:822-4.
Li S-L, Han J-D. A case report of atypical scrotal leiomyoma. Case Rep Dermatol 2013;5:316-20.
Cabello BR, López M-BB, Verdú TF, Monzó J, Castaño GI, Moralejo GM, et al
. Giant bizarre scrotal leiomyoma. Arch Esp Urol 2004;57:847-51.
Fadare O, Wang S, Mariappan MR. Pathologic quiz case: A 69-year-old asymptomatic man with a scrotal mass. Atypical (symplastic or bizarre) leiomyoma of the scrotum. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2004;128:e37-8.
Sevilla CF, Meseguer GP, Roca EM, Gómez CA, Mola AM, Sala AA. Atypical or bizarre leiomyoma of the scrotum. Report of one case and bibliographic review. Arch Esp Urol 2004;57:428-31.
Celia A, Bruschi M, De Stefani S, Baisi B, Cesinaro AM, Micali S, et al.
Bizarre leiomyoma of scrotum. Arch Ital Urol Androl 2005;77:113-4.
Kato Y, Hori JI, Taniguchi N, Hashimoto H, Kaneko S, Yachiku S. Solitary genital leiomyoma of the tunica dartos: A case report and review of the literature in Japan. Acta Urol Jpn 2005;51:699-701.
Philip J, Manikandan R, Vishwanathan P, Mathew J. Symplastic scrotal leiomyoma: a case report. J Med Case Rep 2008;2:295. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-2-295.
Sherwani RK, Rahman K, Akhtar K, Zaheer S, Hassan MJ, Haider A. Leiomyoma of scrotum. Indian J Pathol Microbiol 2008;51:72-3.
] [Full text]
Masood J, Voulgaris S, Atkinson P, Carr TW. A rare symplastic or bizarre leiomyoma of the scrotum: a case report and review of the literature. Cases J 2008;1:381. doi: 10.1186/1757-1626-1-381.
Malhotra P, Walia H, Singh A, Ramesh V. Leiomyoma cutis: A clinicopathological series of 37 cases. Indian J Dermatol 2010;55:337-41.
] [Full text]
Prueksaritanond S, Prueksaritanond S, Ratanarapee S, Prueksaritanond C. Scrotal Pain as the First Manifestation of Scrotal Leiomyoma: A Case Report. J Med Assoc Thai 2010;93:633-6.
Narang T, Singh S V. Nodule on the scrotum. Skinmed. 2011;9:323-5.
Rao S, Fimate P, Ramakrishnan R, Rajendiran S. Atypical leiomyoma of scrotum. J Cutan Aesthet Surg 2012;5:216-7.
] [Full text]
Su Z, Li G, Wang Y, Yu Z, Chen Z, Ni L, et al
. Bizarre leiomyoma of the scrotum: A case report and review of the literature. Oncol Lett; 2014;7:1701-3.
Matoso A, Chen S, Plaza JA, Osunkoya AO, Epstein JI. Symplastic Leiomyomas of the Scrotum. Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:1410-7.
Parasa G, Prasanna M, Turlapati S. Scrotal leiomyoma. J NTR Univ Health Sci 2015;4:263-5. [Full text]
Asotra S. Leiomyoma of scrotum. Arch Med Health Sci 2016;4:238-40. [Full text]
Bell RC, Austin ET, Arnold SJ, Lin FC, Walker JR, Larsen BT. Rare Leiomyoma of the Tunica Dartos: A Case Report with Clinical Relevance for Malignant Transformation and HLRCC. Case Rep Pathol 2016;2016:1-5.
Sharma M, Atri SK. Leiomyoma of scrotum: A case report. Int J Sci Res 2017;6:196-7.
Aluko TBS, Masi ZMD, Tomaszewski J, Germaine PDO. Scrotal sac leiomyoma: Case report of a rare benign scrotal mass. Radiol Case Reports 2018;13:411-4.
Ijeoma Nkemdilim Chibuzo,
Department of Surgery, University College Hospital Ibadan, Ibadan, Oyo State
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
[Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4]
| Article Access Statistics|
| Viewed||515 |
| PDF Downloaded||49 |