• Users Online: 73
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2010  |  Volume : 3  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 124-130

Osteoporosis


WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UK

Correspondence Address:
John A Kanis
WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases University of Sheffield Medical School Beech Hill Road, Sheffield S10 2RX
UK
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The clinical significance of osteoporosis lies in the fractures that arise, but the diagnosis of osteoporosis relies on the quantitative assessment of bone mineral density. There are a number of other indications for bone densitometry including monitoring of treatment, determining the extent of bone loss and assessment of suitability for certain treatments. Most commonly, bone density is used to determine eligibility for treatment. However, diagnostic thresholds differ from intervention thresholds for several reasons. Firstly, the fracture risk varies at different ages, even with the same T-score. Other factors that determine intervention thresholds include the presence of clinical risk factors such as a prior fracture, a family history of hip fracture, smoking and high alcohol consumption and secondary causes of osteoporosis. Algorithms that integrate the weight of clinical risk factors for fracture risk have been developed by the World Health Organization. This FRAX® tool (www.shef.ac.uk/FRAX) computes the 10-year probability of hip fracture or a major osteoporotic fracture (clinical spine, hip, forearm or humerus). Probability-based intervention thresholds are now being incorporated into new management guidelines that integrate FRAX® with clinical management algorithms.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed167    
    Printed9    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded22    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal