• Users Online: 3695
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2009  |  Volume : 2  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 108-118

Heart rate and qt interval in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rat


1 Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
2 Department of Anatomy, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, Al Ain, United Arab Emirates
3 Acting Chair of Electronic Engineering, Higher Colleges of Technology, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates

Correspondence Address:
F C Howarth
Department of Physiology, Faculty of Medicine & Health Sciences, UAE University, P.O. Box 17666, Al Ain
United Arab Emirates
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

Aim: Prolonged QT interval is a common finding in diabetic patients. The effects of streptozotocin (STZ) – induced diabetes on QT interval has been investigated by application of 4 standard QT correction algorithms. Methods: The electrocardiogram was recorded in STZ-treated (60 mg/kg bodyweight, ip) and age-matched control rats with a biotelemetry system for the period of the study. Results: Heart rate (HR) was significantly (P<0.01) reduced and QT interval was signifycantly (P<0.05) prolonged in diabetic rats compared to controls at 8, 10 and 12 weeks after STZ treatment. At 8 weeks HR was 260±16 BPM (n=5) in diabetic rats compared to 333±25 BPM (n=5) in controls and QT interval was 70±7 ms (n=5) in diabetic rats compared to 59±6 ms (n=5) in controls. When QT interval was corrected for HR there was no longer any significant difference in QT interval between diabetic and control rats. The effects of different correction techniques have been compared and the consequences considered. Conclusion: The rapid and dramatic reductions in HR observed after administration of STZ are associated with a prolongation of the QT interval. However, the magnitude of the difference of the QT interval between the STZ and control groups was not significant after QT interval correction for the difference in HR.


[PDF]*
Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)
 

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed181    
    Printed11    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded27    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal